On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 12:12:36 PM +0100, Tom Davies wrote:
Hi :)
I feel that going with Extensions is better than doing macros. It
seems to affect LO in a more general way rather than 1 document at a
time....
yes (and I agree with everything else you said) but... going with
extensions is something that only what, 0.00001% of office suite users
know how to do?
for most people, the choice between:
- learning to write real extensions (assuning they do HAVE the skills)
- waiting that somebody writes them
- writing themselves a quick and dirty macro that does almost
everything they need
is a total no brainer, isn't it? That's why I ask about "macro
interoperability". The less macros there are the better, sure, but
let's have a clear idea of what is possible, or should be avoided.
--
M. Fioretti http://mfioretti.com http://stop.zona-m.net
Your own civil rights and the quality of your life heavily depend on how
software is used *around* you
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscribe@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.