On 3/20/2014 5:28 PM, e-letter <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
Thank you. It is a worry that 17 out of 24 "features" are in fact
devoted to "interoperability" with m$.
Nope, not a worry at all. Compatibility with the office product that
holds the vast majority of the market share is a decent objective.
e-letter, your rabid purist attitude really gets tiring.
So, new users to LO, be_very_ _very_ aware: LO documents by default
are not standards compliant, which minimises the possibility that such
documents created by LO in default mode will be accessible by other
(including future LO?) odf-compliant products.
And also please STOP WITH THE FUD.
Your comment above is a plain, outright LIE.
To unsubscribe e-mail to: email@example.com
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: LO compatibility · Tanstaafl
- Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: LO compatibility (continued)
Impressum (Legal Info)
: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our trademark policy