2014-02-10 2:08 GMT+01:00 Pedro <pedlino@gmail.com>:
In case someone is following this thread,
​We are ;)​
I received the file by mail and
the error described was a consequence of the functions used if some cells
were not filled in. Therefore it wasn't a bug in the 4.1 branch.
The file did reveal some serious mess in 4.2 but hopefully these
regressions
will be fixed in the near future (maybe some of them are already fixed...)
Is it possible to reproduce the issue with a minimal, non sensitive sample
file ? It might be useful to have an example of what did go wrong in 4.2,
in case there is more report about this later.​​
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscribe@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.