OK, to this and other recent posts, please note that my intent wasn't to
open a rant-fest. I have found myself wondering about the claims about
file structure being a problem even for MSO itself. My original post
was intended to provide one example of a case where Excel saved a
specific file but then couldn't re-open it without throwing a warning
(unusual enough that some users might well panic about it). That plus a
few other specific issues I've encountered that make me like LO/OO even
more than I did before. While I've read about the issue of the OpenXML
standard issues, I hadn't experienced it yet, nor have I read of
specific cases where someone had that experience (and I don't mean
second hand or less).
If anyone wants to add to this, may I humbly suggest you provide
specific examples of issues _you've_ had (not that you've read or heard
about). E.g., "I saved a file as CSV, and within 5 minutes tried to
reopen it but Excel failed to do so. It gave me the following error:"
That provides a specific situation that others can test. The more
specific the better.
But to say the open XML standard changes so that Excel can't open it
just doesn't translate to the general user, even if it IS true. Again,
specific examples help.
Carl
On 2/7/14 10:47 PM, null wrote:
Hello,
I thought I should add to the rant:
If you think Microsoft Excel not being able to import formats it
exports is bad, consider Microsoft's disastrous "OpenXML" standards.
Notice I said standards, not standard. .docx, .pptx, and other files
with x at the end are stored in the Microsoft OpenXML format. There
are three different standards--for the same file type! Depending on
the operating system and Microsoft Office version, a different XML
standard is used. This can cause a .docx file, for example, not to
render correctly in Microsoft Word 2013 if it were saved using 2010;
even the operating system is a factor in which XML standard is used.
So, sometimes, Microsoft Office can't open Microsoft Office files.
Not to mention the extra features that don't work, no one uses, and
takes up valuable disk space, such as PDF Reflow. When will Microsoft
realize that you can't "reflow" a PDF? The implementation for each
OpenXML standard is nearly 6,000 pages long! So, it really doesn't do
what Microsoft said it would do; they made the system so complex to
try to force more people to using Microsoft Office, and now their
products can't read files.
Regards,
xmlhttprequest.open@gmail.com
--
Carl Paulsen
Dover, NH 03820
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscribe@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.