On 6/02/2014 5:31 am, Robert Holtzman wrote:
On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 01:37:52PM +0000, Tom Davies wrote:
Bottom posting requires a ton of extra work such as trimming and such
which office workers really do not have time for.
Trimming is a sensible thing to do, whichever way you post. It's work
for the poster, not the reader, and top-posting is a benefit for the
reader, not (primarily) the poster.
I really hope you don't mean that trimming is a waste of time. Ever see
a reply to a digest message that quoted the whole digest. What fun.
But doesn't trimming undermine the argument? How can the discussion be
read sequentially when bits of it have been deleted?
Impressum (Legal Info)
: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our trademark policy