Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: LO 4.1.3

Thanks for the hint with 4.0.6. This version is indeed very stable and it has a least one feature 
which I missed in previous version. Thus I currently very happy with 4.0.6.

I used 4.0.5 before, changed to 4.1.3.2 and then back to 4.0.6. Maybe Tom is write and something 
happend during the download/installation of 4.1.3.2 and thus this version showed a few bugs of which 
one I could not accept.

Currently I am thinking about installing 4.1.4 but maybe I don't have time for installation and then 
4.1.5 will be released.....


On 2013-12-17 05:47, Kracked_P_P---webmaster wrote:
> If you want to try 4.0.6 first, since you jumped from 3.6.x, it might be a good idea.  It is at 
> the end on that line and I use it all of the time.
>
> Sure, you can try 4.1.4 when it comes out, but 4.0.6 is very stable and you can use it as a 
> stepping stone to the 4.1.x line. The "messages" about 4.1.3 being too "buggy" for you [or others] 
> suggests going to 4.0.6 and not going back down to the 3.6.x line.  Later, when all of the 
> "possible problems" with 4.1.4 comes in, you can decide if it is ready for you to use.
>
> Still, personally, I would try 4.0.6, for now.  Then look into 4.1.4 or 4.1.5 later.
>
>
> On 12/16/2013 06:47 AM, Dr. R. O. Stapf - the service institute japan wrote:
> > Hi Tom,Thanks for the hint, I will do with the 4.1.4 version which is
> >        scheduled to be released this week.RPresidentthe service institute japan... the service 
> > enhancement companywww.tsij.org
> > On 2013-12-14 00:46, Tom Davies wrote:
> > Hi :)
> > Ahh, i think just go for a standard normal reinstall of 4.1.3. maybe
> > re-download the installer to make sure that isn't the problem
> > Regards from
> > Tom :)
> >
> >
> > On 13 December 2013 02:42, rost52bugquestcontri@online.dewrote:The fact that I had to downgrade 
> > from 4.2.3.2 to 4.0.6 due to bugs and
> > Nino's proposal to install 2 versions parallel made my thinking that it
> > would be very efficient to have the install wiazerd modify to use it to
> > replace a version or install it parallel to an existing one.
> >
> >
> > I am just hesitant to go trough the work of installing LibO through the
> > command line.
> >
> >
> > In my case I would install 4.0.6 (stable) and 4.1.3.2 (with some nasty bugs
> > for me but some interesting features as well). With 2 versions I also could
> > do easy testing for bug reports.
> >
> >
> > Is there interest/support for having the installed wizard modified to enable
> > parallel installations?
> >
> >
> > On 2013-12-12 23:07, Nino Novak wrote:Am 12.12.2013 09:38, schrieb Kunwar Shivpal Singh:What 
> > would happen if I download LO 3.5.7 (already started it from Source
> > Forge. Will there be a clash between the 2 versions? Will LO 4.1.3.2
> > allow me to install the older version LO 3.5.7?Kunwar, if it is of interest for you: you can 
> > install both versions in
> > parallel - seehttps://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Installing_in_parallelRegards,
> > Nino--
> > To unsubscribe e-mail 
> > to:users+unsubscribe@global.libreoffice.orgProblems?http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/Posting 
> > guidelines + more:http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/NetiquetteList 
> > archive:http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/All messages sent to this list will be 
> > publicly archived and cannot be
> > deleted


--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscribe@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted