Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: LO 4.1.3.2

Quoting NoOp <glgxg@sbcglobal.net>:

> On 11/05/2013 06:53 AM, Cliff Scott wrote:
> > ** Reply to message from NoOp <glgxg@sbcglobal.net> on Mon, 04 Nov 2013
> > 23:00:26 -0800
> >
> > > On 11/04/2013 12:38 PM, Cliff Scott wrote:
> > > > ** Reply to message from "Cliff Scott" <cfly@intergate.com> on Sat, 2 Nov
> > > > 2013 15:29:02 -0500
> ...
>
> '. I'm showing the following:
> > > Calibri - Regular|Bold|Italic|Bold italic
> > > Calibri Light - Light|Light Italic|Bold|Bold Italic
> > >
> > > I'll now purge the font(s) due to licencing issues. :-)
> > > I find that FreeSans 11 is a very close match to Calibri 12. You might
> > > want to give that a try. <http://www.gnu.org/software/freefont/>
> >
> > NoOp - thanks for your ideas. They gave me a clue how to work around the
> > issue. It's not the ideal way and the results are not exactly what I wanted,
> > but may be useable.
> >
> > Going into Format/Character I find that the Light option is listed under
> > Calibri, but unfortunately Light Bold isn't listed so when I bold the Light
> > font it ends up as the Regular Calibri Bold and not Light Bold that  
> >  it should
> > be. Apparently LO 4.1.3.2 tries to combine the two fonts into one family
> > rather than keep them separate. The Mac Font Book also lists them as one
> > family where in fact they are two families with a common base name. Somehow
> > LO 4.0.5 keeps them separate, but 4.1.3.2 doesn't. As I said earlier Open
> > Office also sees them as separate families. At least now I have a better
> > handle on what's happening. Thanks.
>
> I had to install AOOo in a parallel folder so that it doesn't end up
> polluting my file associations (long story) & found:
>
> Both AOOo AOO401m5(Build:9714)  -  Rev. 1524958 2013-09-20 11:54 - Linux
> x86_64) and LO 4.1.3.2 act identical, at least on the linux versions.
> Both use a substitute font for Calibri Light Bold/Bold Italic. That is
> because only Calibri Light and Calibri Light Italic are in the fonts
> that I copied over from Win7. Calibri Bold and Bold Italic
> (calibriz.ttf) are available, so those fonts aren't substituted.
>
> You can verify by Format|Character and then selecting Calibre
> Light|Bold/Bold Light and notice the notification: "This font style will
> be simulated or the closest matching style will be used.". If you select
> only Claibri Light|Light/Light Italic the message will change to: "The
> same font will be used on both your printer and your screen".

Correct. I have done all that. The issue with LO 4.1.3.2 is that it  
cannot differentiate between the font sub-families, I guess you would  
call them, so it thinks Calibri and Calibri Light are the same family.  
They are in a sense, but not in another sense and LO 4.0.5 can tell  
the difference and 4.1.3.2 cannot. AOO can tell the difference also  
even better than LO 4.0.5 in that it separates out Calibri, Calibri  
Light and Calibri Light Italic as separate fonts in the drop down list  
so I can choose which ever one I want. In 4.1.3.2 I can make the  
Calibri Light work using the Format/Character menus, but cannot any  
way get Calibri Light Bold to work as it isn't listed anywhere.  
Somehow LO has changed how the fonts are differentiated and it really  
messes up this font access.

Cliff


----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.



--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscribe@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted