On 11/2/13 3:48 AM, Charles-H. Schulz wrote:
Le Fri, 1 Nov 2013 22:59:33 +0000,
e-letter <firstname.lastname@example.org> a écrit :
On 01/11/2013, Charles-H. Schulz
But when we come to think of it, these people started somewhere, one
day, to contribute, and while they all have their own reasons, we
(the people in charge of "marketing") thought that everybody has
the ability to contribute. The question is: how can we make it
1)interesting 2) accessible 3)easy to understand what the various
tasks are 4)possible to spread the word about it?
Question 2 requires a definition of "contribute", e.g. is a bug
submission contribution? Is helping another user via the mailing list
Users support, yes.
Q5 answers above, therefore should appear in the survey before q2!
Q11 what is the relevance of knowing users' locations?
Agree with Mr Springer's message.
LO people should simply read the mailing list; every random date,
select a random number of mailing lists threads, read, analyse and
consider whether further action is necessary. You will get much better
information than a biased "survey"
I read Mr Springer's message and we do not want to have a biased survey
at all. One of the reasons we came up with a survey is that we were
precisely not able to get the big picture by reading mailing lists.
It's important to note that there is no good or bad answer in this
survey, it's about understanding opportunities we could create for
Most if not all of these surveys that tend to be biased in some way, and
all of multiple choice surveys in general, have the same problem. Not
enough options for the user. IMO, the survey could simply be modified,
and then the construction of the questions as well as the actual
questions aren't so important.
1. Always have a "None of the above" selection
2. Allow the selection of more than one option, or no option at all.
3. Always have a comments window for each page so you can explain
your choice(s). Multiple choice only limits the feedback you get.
4. At the end of survey, have a general comments section where the user
can express just about anything regarding LO.
Surveys constructed without the above features will almost always be
biased in some way.
A scenario: 100 people check out the survey. 40 of them are like me,
they can't give you accurate answers. They exit, and you just lost 40%
of potentially useable information.
All surveys are meant to tell the originator(s) information they want to
know. But the information you want may not be what you *need* to know
to be successful.
I could go on about why I'm looking for LO alternatives, but that's not
the topic of this thread. If you are interested and have the time, I'd
discuss LO off list. The email address in the header is valid.
Last but not least the geography might count, yes. You do not see your
contribution potential whether you're in a country that has ubiquitous
broadband or in a country where most people connect to the internet via
phones or for the wealthiest, satellite.
The geography info also tells you where your users are, also. That can
be helpful to identify where you may need to find out why usage in some
locations is low. Low usage may not have anything to do with LO at all.
As for satellite usage, wealthiest does not always apply if you consider
only cost alone, not speed. I've lived at my location for 9.5 years.
Modem and true satellite (no "mixed" systems) were the only options
until 2-3 years ago when a main trunk line was replaced with fiber
optics. I had satellite for many years. For the same price, DSL
basically just gave me more speeds and unlimited data. Not enough
difference in price for the base packages to really be a factor.
I do hope you have the time to contact me via email. (HTML preferred)
I'd like to see some serious competition for MS Office, but there
appears to be none, either open source or commercial.
Mac OS X 10.8.5
To unsubscribe e-mail to: email@example.com
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Impressum (Legal Info)
: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our trademark policy