Technically, the x86 indicates the architecture, the 64 indicates the
instruction set width. So x86_64 is a 64 bit chip, and the x86_32 is a
32 bit chip. Obviously, when apps (like LO) are marked as x86_64, they
mean that it is intended for a 64 bit OS running on a 64 bit chip, as
opposed to a 32 bit OS running on a 32 bit (if any still exist that are
modern enough to be supported) or 64 bit chip. It does (should) not
indicate a 32 bit app capable of running on a 64 bit OS, simple an app
(32 or 64 bit) capable of running on a 64 bit OS. It would, infact,
_suggest_ a 64 bit app, or at least that *something* had been done to
differentiate it from the 32 bit version, otherwise why the distinction.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X86
Just, you know, FYI.... er... sorry... to bother anyone...
:)
Paul
On Fri, 26 Jul 2013 19:46:16 +0200
Andrew Brown <andrewbr@icon.co.za> wrote:
This is a structure from the devs in a file naming convention,
indicating its a 32bit app (x86_), that can be installed on a 64bit
operating system (_64), not necessarily a 64bit app. And in the case
of LO, it's definitely not yet a 64bit app. They still have to code
32bit apps to be functional on 64bit O/S's, unlike a naitve 32bit app
for a 32bit O/S.
Hope this explains it better.
Regards
Andrew Brown
On 26/07/2013 06:56 PM, James Knott wrote:
Andrew Brown wrote:
Umm!!! factually no, LO is still 32bit on Linux
Then why is there an x86_64 version, when the 32 bit version should
also work well?
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscribe@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Context
- Re: [libreoffice-users] LO 4.1 upgrade from 4.0.4 - now does not find Java (continued)
Re: [libreoffice-users] LO 4.1 upgrade from 4.0.4 - now does not find Java · Andrew Brown
Re: [libreoffice-users] LO 4.1 upgrade from 4.0.4 - now does not find Java · Paul
Re: [libreoffice-users] LO 4.1 upgrade from 4.0.4 - now does not find Java · James Knott
Re: [libreoffice-users] LO 4.1 upgrade from 4.0.4 - now does not find Java · Andrew Brown
Re: [libreoffice-users] LO 4.1 upgrade from 4.0.4 - now does not find Java · Andrew Brown
Re: [libreoffice-users] LO 4.1 upgrade from 4.0.4 - now does not find Java · James Knott
Re: [libreoffice-users] LO 4.1 upgrade from 4.0.4 - now does not find Java · James Knott
Re: [libreoffice-users] LO 4.1 upgrade from 4.0.4 - now does not find Java · Andrew Brown
Re: [libreoffice-users] LO 4.1 upgrade from 4.0.4 - now does not find Java · Andrew Brown
Re: [libreoffice-users] LO 4.1 upgrade from 4.0.4 - now does not find Java · Les Howell
Re: [libreoffice-users] LO 4.1 upgrade from 4.0.4 - now does not find Java · Andrew Brown
Re: [libreoffice-users] LO 4.1 upgrade from 4.0.4 - now does not find Java · Andrew Brown
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.