Re: [libreoffice-users] LO 4.1 upgrade from 4.0.4 - now does not find Java

On 2013-07-26 8:18 AM, Jay Lozier <jslozier@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Jul 2013 08:03:43 -0400, Tanstaafl
> <tanstaafl@libertytrek.org> wrote:
>
> > On 2013-07-26 7:54 AM, James Knott <james.knott@rogers.com> wrote:
> > > Tom Davies wrote:
> > > > My guess is that the default is 64bit or else other apps might need
> > > > the 64bit version.  It's generally not a good idea to have more than 1
> > > > version of Java although even 1 might well be more than you need now.
> > >
> > > The big question is why are the Windows version of LibreOffice and
> > > OpenOffice still 32 bit only.  They've both been available in 64 bit
> > > versions on Linux for years.
> >
> > Because there is basically no good reason to use a 64bit version of an
> > Office application - unless you really need to work with a spreadsheet
> > or text document that approaches 4GB in size (shudder)...
> >
> > Even Microsoft recommends installing the 32bit version of Office on
> > 64bit machines.
> The 4GB limit causes problems with databases moreso than a text document
> or spreadsheet.

Personally I can't see using LibO for managing/working with databases 
that big...

--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscribe@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted