Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2013 Archives by date, by thread · List index


Le 20/03/13 16:15, Paul D. Mirowsky a écrit :

The most frequently recommended way is to create a unique query or view
that returns all the values that you require from each table into a
single source (query result). However, doing so, depending on the way
your data sets are set up, and the relationships between your tables,
might not be easy, or indeed might even be impossible.

And yes, I haven't ruled out the possibility that there might even be a
bug in the functioning of LO, as mailmerge is not one of the most
reliable/complete aspects of LO at the moment. As with most things
Base-related, bits of it regularly break down with successive version
releases of LO. In fact, I don't think that there has been a release yet
of LO where Base functionality as a whole wasn't degraded in some way.
That is why some of us, let's call ourselves the "war-weary", prefer to
remain with older versions of LO, i.e. 3.3.x for Base related stuff.


Alex



-- 
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+help@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.