Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2013 Archives by date, by thread · List index

On Thu, 2013-02-14 at 07:16 -0800, Joel Madero wrote:
On 02/13/2013 10:44 PM, Jean-Francois Nifenecker wrote:
Le 14/02/2013 03:21, anne-ology a écrit :
yes, very interesting idea.
Yes, indeed.


I wonder, though, how would the fixed bug integrate into the code 
maintained by the LibO crew.
It is open to anyone, and anyone is welcome to contribute so that 
wouldn't be an issue. Interesting discussion happening here, please keep 
it alive and pass the word :-D

I haven't seen a message in this thread from someone with an libreoffice
e-mail address...  is this at all 'sanctioned' by the project?   Someone
in the project on-board?  Someone credible is vouching that  is legit and on-the-level?

Adam Tauno Williams  GPG D95ED383
Systems Administrator, Python Developer, LPI / NCLA

For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to:
Posting guidelines + more:
List archive:
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.