On 12/02/2013 at 10:53, "e-letter" <inpost@gmail.com> wrote:
If LO, or any other odf-compliant software disappears, you can find
another.
Yeah, especially since LO default saving format incorporates number of non-
standard extensions that other ODF-compliant software will just ignore.
Don't get me wrong - I appreciate many of these extensions, as they give me
ability to use great features not covered by ODF spec.
But I am also worried by the fact, that over thirty years after introducing
first word processor software, we are still at a stage where documents can be
freely exchanged only by users of the same software in the same version.
--
Best regards
Mirosław Zalewski
--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+help@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Context
- RE: [libreoffice-users] Bug 60390 - FILEOPEN: Cannot open particular document (continued)
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.