Re: [libreoffice-users] messages returned

At 21:27 24/11/2012 +0900, Thomas Blasejewicz wrote:
> This message COULD be sent in response to my own post, but NOT in 
> response to Mr. Davies' post. Now that the message has been posted, 
> it does not matter any more, but
> somehow I would like to know why ...
>
> (2012/11/21 17:53), Tom Davies wrote:
> > Have you tried renaming your user profile? Is it possible the 
> > problem is being caused by an [Redacted]?
> >
> > I'm not sure if it would be better to post a new bug-report and 
> > link to the old one, or just add a comment to say the regression 
> > appears to have reappeared.
>
> [Redacted]: I use mainly the same [redacted]s on my home computer 
> and the one in my office (would have to check whether there are 
> differences)  Home computer works fine. So, likelihood of a bug is 
> not so high - I suspect.
>
> Java: checked JRE this morning (had two days off here in Japan).  It 
> was installed (1.6.037). Updated to 1.7.0.09 just now.  No 
> change.  LO crashes 100% when trying to use File -> Wizard.
>
> Any other ideas?
>
> Thank you.

The original rejection said "Mail appears to be spam [...] and is 
rejected due to policy."  Your message contained the word _e x t e n 
s i o n_ (or its plural) three times in a little over 120 
words.  That's quite a high concentration.  I hesitate to point this 
out, but that word is a feature of certain types of spam.

(My first attempt to send this, without the editing, has - not 
surprisingly - also not reached the list.)

Brian Barker


--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+help@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted