Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2012 Archives by date, by thread · List index


       I agree.



On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 9:37 AM, Dr. R. O Stapf
<reinhold@stapf-online.com>wrote:


On 12.10.2012 01:36, Gordon Burgess-Parker wrote:

On 11/10/12 13:27, Andreas Säger wrote:


This is not a free clone of some other program. All it can do is loading
.doc files fairly well. Please switch to this software or stay with
WinWord.


 And with that attitude on a help list, LO is never likely to become any
sort of threat to MS Office, is it?

 I also would like to comment on the "All it can do is loading .doc files
fairly well.".
I entirely switch over to LO and find especially Writer better than Word.
The styles-functionality in Writer is great. About 2 years ago I had to put
a master thesis in the right format and it was a nightmare and a huge
workload in WORD. In Writer I assume I could have done it in a fraction of
the time and without much headaches.
What want to say is it would be nice if users of LO, who do not understand
ALL the features and functionality of LO AND MSO are be careful with such
negative statements. However if there are bugs or requests for new
features, they should be expressed and reported. This helps LO to become
more known.



-- 
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+help@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.