I agree with Mark.
The question itself is interesting but an answer does not explain
Let us turn the question around:how many people should use LO-Base if
there was a LibO-version available that is ready to use, reliable, and
free of problems (bugs).
its installing instructions should be complete, consequent, and placed
in one easy to find place
processes at a level (e.g.) similar to MSAccess (2003) --the ability to
build decent reports included (and the embedded db-engine and its guides
up-dated and supported)
the program's every single detail should work -- functions, features,
the guiding documentation (& help) should be logic, understandable and
in every detail correlating with the program
With the exception of heavy industrial systems the need and
possibilities of up to medium complex databases in everyday life at home
are unlimited -- only limited by the decision to start creating.
There are really nothing difficult in creating such "home databases"--
no need to be an "Einstein", if only good guidings are available.
Creating database applications is also a very interesting form of brain
training -- and the feeling when succeeding is a "yippee". If you know
how to use Writer/Word and Calc/Excel (esp. as "databases") you are
almost half way. What you still has to do is to study and learn some few
basic theories about and how to create the tables and the
queries(experiment manually, not with wizards, if you want to learn and
understand);creating the forms and the reports is just a matter of
If you want LibO to be a popular competitor to MSO (& MSAccess), then
the rest is only a question of marketing.
As far as I have experienced LibO-Base (v. 3.4.5), there are only a few
details left to fixed before LibO should be almost perfect.
A basic rule in quality systems (ISO9000) is that if you want
improvement you must first identify the problems (faults, weaknesses) --
and then follow up by a plan and an improving activity.
LibO might be a very fine and usable suit -- especially if also its Base
module (docs included) should work properly, at least as promised in
Mr Dan Lewis is doing a good and valuable work when updating and
completing the Base's documentation and it is obvious that without any
help his project will take a long time.
Last winter I started to read and follow up experimenting Dan's docs
with the intension to send my comments as points of views. And hadquite
a lot already done.
At this list I several times also mentioned some quite basic
problems/faults both in Base's docs and especially in the modules's
I never got any kind of response, I don' t know if my proposals were
noticed, nor do I know if the mentioned things have been fixed.
So I skipped working any further on experimenting LibO-Base and its
docs. (I am now back to OO and tries to learn MySQL)
You may take this as some sort of a contribution too.
On 4.10.2012 18:04, Mark Stanton wrote:
Question: How many people do you know use Base, or have tried to use
Whilst there is some quite valid criticism of Base, I don't think answering
this question says as much about Base as it does about the general usage
of databases. They are less familiar than word processors, spreadsheets or
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: email@example.com
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Impressum (Legal Info)
: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our trademark policy