Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2012 Archives by date, by thread · List index


Hi :)
The 3.5.3 seems a lot more stable than the 3.5.2!  Far, far fewer people writing in about it!!  
Hopefully the 3.5.4 will be even better.  It's probably still best to stick with the 3.4.6 where 
you need something reliable but the 3.5.3 is definitely worth taking for a test-drive if you can.  

@ Pedro, i think the bias mentioned was Ubuntu rather then other Gnu&Linux (or possibly Bsd) 
distros rather than Windows! Lol.  Good to see an elegant (and probably deliberate) 
misunderstanding there! :)  

I have a feeling that people often say Ubuntu when they are really using one of the "clones" or 
Mint or others in the same family.  Like i often say Firefox when i am really using Seamonkey which 
uses the Firefox engine (gecko i think) and is produced by the same people.  It just makes it 
easier to get to an answer quicker sometimes.  

Regards from
Tom :)  


--- On Wed, 23/5/12, Pedro <pedlino@gmail.com> wrote:

From: Pedro <pedlino@gmail.com>
Subject: [libreoffice-users] Re: installation of LO35; removal oy LO33 required?
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Date: Wednesday, 23 May, 2012, 10:06


e-letter wrote

Unfortunately, it is required to change from LO33 to LO35 to use a
particular new feature.


You don't have to change. You can install version 3.5.3 in parallel
(http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Installing_in_parallel) or use the
portable version (http://www.libreoffice.org/download/portable/)


e-letter wrote

Where is the report within QA that shows LO35 passed standard quality
tests?


Does this exist?


e-letter wrote

Is this true, that LO353 is near perfect?


I would say 3.4.6 is closer (with less features, of course :) )


e-letter wrote

There is too much bias in favour of ubuntu users (but then that is a
biased opinion!).


It's not a matter of bias. Ubuntu contributes with developers to the
project. Microsoft surprisingly doesn't :)


e-letter wrote

Is there really significant change in language packs between versions?
Are language pack and help packs significantly different between versions?
Is it not possible to use latest software versions with previous
language pack/help pack versions?


Since there are new options in the menus and dialogs, the language packs and
help files need to reflect this.

Using a language pack from a previous version will probably leave you with a
mixed language interface... The previous help files can be used but they
will not describe the added features...

Regards,
Pedro

--
View this message in context: 
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/installation-of-LO35-removal-oy-LO33-required-tp3985474p3985486.html
Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-- 
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+help@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


-- 
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+help@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.