Am 27.04.2012 09:13, Milos Sramek wrote:
Dear Tom,
do you have any references to those court cases? Sounds very
interesting. RTF is in Slovakia one of the officialy approved standards
to be used by public administration (besides pdf, odf and HTML). Of
course, since MS is everywhere and everybody uses RTF. Information about
those court trials would be a nice argument against RTF, the
compatibility of which in LO/OO/OOO is really pain. This would show why
is it so.
Milos
Again:
http://diaryproducts.net/for/geek/microsoft_rtf_specification_nightmare
The software you are using right now is a reference implementation for
ODF. ODF is an ISO standard for office documents since 2006. It is the
only standard which does not depend on a single vendor, which is
perfectly documented, extremely stable with a feature set close to
MSOffice, easy enough to implement without any legal issues.
For RTF I use to recommend the free (as in "free beer") WinWord viewer
software by Microsoft or the MS WordPad which they put on all their
computers.
--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+help@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.