On 20/03/2012, darwinev0lved<darwinev0lved@gmail.com> wrote:
HI, I was having problem with a docx document that work sent me (actually,
this isn't the first time, but it'd be nice to sort it if poss.). When I try
to save it, it crashes LO, I can recover it, I can save it as an odt but at
some point I'm going to have to send it back, so I need to be able to save
it as a docx.
Your company should be paying you to buy a legitimate copy of m$...
Why do you want LO to be a m$-clone? Who benefits?
m$ formats are irrelevant to odf. The priority for LO is superior
behaviour of the software with native formats.
How does the perfect m$-clone behaviour of LO desired by so many
unwilling to pay the m$ tax benefit the preferred proliferation of
odf?
I though it might be something off with the document itself, so I opened up
a blank document and tried to save that as a docx file - well this time I
got "Libreoffice 3.5 has stopped working"
So, not great.
Strategically, it is great; m$ fans are forced to make a decision: pay
the m$ to continue using and propagating the m$ formats.
Have you conducted a full cost-benefit analysis of the time you are
wasting (yours, programmers who choose to write code gratis) compared
to you buying m$ and therefore releasing more time available to
improve odf???
Advice, thoughts?
Please create a new document in odf using LO. When you open that
document using m$ and notice the destruction of the quality of your
original document, write to m$ and ask them to explain why m$ is
unable to open your odf document properly and correctly. Don't forget
to also ask m$ how to submit a bug report for the faulty performance
of m$. Tell us the response.
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.