The issue back then was everyone had their own proprietary file format,
since there was no common one that could be used by any company, except
"txt" and other formats that did not keep the file's formatting
properly. No company would allow you to use their proprietary formats.
The there was a movement to create a common file format that everyone
could use. In the end, that set of document formats developed into the
Open Document Formats.
Now any company can use this non-proprietaryset of document formats to
create, read, or edit documents created by other companies' packages.
Yes, it was total chaos. I remember having to manually edit some
document files in a "text editor" to remove the formatting codes so it
could be read by a different word processor, since the facility did not
have that package. That worked for some formats, but not others. Now
there is one standard ODF, although Microsoft would say it is their
formats.
Yes MSO formats have dominated the field of what formats are used, but
MS did not share its proprietary formats with the competitors. OOo and
LO had to reverse-engineer its ability to read MSO formats. MS did try
to get its "XML based formats" [docx and such] made into an
International standard, but would not give up control of its
development, which is a requirement to make it fully an open standard -
no one company can control an open standard, since it would have its
development "controlled" by an international committee of companies and
groups of people/users who want to make it better. MS wanted to publish
a version of their "standard" in a way that there would be still
proprietary parts to the open standard that required MS products to use
them properly. Also they wanted to decide what would be done to that
"standard" without any other company/group having a say. This is a sore
subject for some of us, with all of MS's legal [and illegal] behind the
scenes politics [and bribery] to make their "open" formats be THE
international standard after the vote decided on ODF as the [one an
only] ISO standard for office document formats.
Chaos was the past. Greed is what is going on now. The "true" use of a
free open format by most [hopefully all] of the office packages should
be our future. LO uses ODF as their default. As changes are proposed
and developed, LO should modify its filters/programming to use those
modifications of ODF properly in their created/edited documents. LO/TDF
is not in control of that format, but can offer up proposals to make it
work better in the "real world" of office use. MS wants every user to
use their "open" formats, but you must use their office package to use
it fully and properly. MS does not want to hand over the ability of its
competitors to read/write/edit files created with their packages, so
that users no longer need to use its office package. That was the way
of most of the word processors and office packages in the past. Most of
them, excluding MS, have decided that it would be better to go with the
international movement and be able to properly read/write/edit a single
fully open set of document formats, instead of forcing users to buy
their package to read/write/edit files that were created with their
packages. It is better to use an ISO set of document formats.
Now these office packages will be used if and only if they are
determined to be the best/easiest package for the users to get their
word done.
LO and other FOSS packages include the idea of "best" to include "free"
in its definition.
For many of us, with limited budgets and other issues, choose free over
paid packages.
"Why pay for software when you can legally get software that does the
same thing for free?" FOSS package creators do not have the "must make
as much profit" attitude as companies like MS does. That attitude is
what drove the file format "chaos" of the early days of desktop
computing. Now that that industry has grown out if its childhood years,
we need to survive its teenage years. The concept of "true openness" of
the Internet hopefully will make its adulthood a much better place, with
less chaos and with a more "grown up" attitude like what people should
teach their children to make them a better adult.
On 01/28/2012 02:43 AM, soumalya ray wrote:
i was just wondering-there are so many file formats in this world.if this
is the case now,what was the picture 5-10 years back!!its a total chaos.
--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+help@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Context
- [libreoffice-users] was: LWP documents · webmaster for Kracked Press Productions
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.