Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index


Hi :)
We have noticed your lack of tolerance and open hostility regarding the matter which you are unable 
to understand.  There is no need to be quite so hostile nor to flare up each time someone quietly 
asks for help.  

Please can you take your argument to the discussion group and/or steering/BoD group rather than 
continuing to bully and intimidate new users to this list.  

This list is meant to be open and welcoming to new users some of whom may be vulnerable and may 
come from cultures that do not appreciate the aggressive stance you usually take.  To be fair, my 
posts are often quite a lot too aggressive too.  

Please try to be a little more gentle to new people here that may not share your point-of-view.  
Regards from
Tom :)



--- On Sat, 26/11/11, e-letter <inpost@gmail.com> wrote:

From: e-letter <inpost@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: can I make Libre default to save as .rtf
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Date: Saturday, 26 November, 2011, 8:48
On 25/11/2011, Italo Vignoli <italo.vignoli@quorum-pr.com>
wrote:

Unfortunately (for you and the people who share the
same idea), history
shows that going face to face against Microsoft is the
wrong strategy.


Cannot see how active promoting odf instead of passive
promotion of m$
is a wrong strategy.


I have written exactly the opposite of what you
understand (I am not a
native English speaker, so is my fault). I have
written that users who
know the advantages of ODF should become evangelists
of the format and
suggest to other users to use ODF, because MS Office
reads and writes
ODF (although in a limited way).


The fact is a significant proportion of users have no
interest in
promoting odf; their primary personal benefit is their
ability to use
LO to send m$ formats to recipients.

Pissing off users by sending them formats that they
are not able to read
(most users do not even know the concept of file
formats), will not
achieve any result other than alienating the
reputation of the software
used to produce the unreadable formats.


This is weak; did youtube fail because initially web
browsers did not
have flash plug-in technology? No, the content was so
strong, flash
became a de facto multimedia standard driven by user
demand.

-- 
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+help@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived
and cannot be deleted


-- 
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+help@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.