Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index


I am a TDF Director and one of the official spokespersons.


e-letter wrote


In other words, do not waste LO programmers' time to resolve your desire
to use LO as a free m$o clone.

You are assuming something completely wrong here. In the future, please
avoid such statements, and - even more important - please listen to people
on this mailing list who seem to be better informed than you are.

TDF developers are working hard to improve the level of interoperability
with many file formats, because we want LibreOffice to be both the best
implementation of ODF (a format that we want to be the standard for
electronic documents) and the most interoperable office suite.

Users are free to use LibreOffice to read and write RTF and DOC/XLS/PPT
files (and even DOCX/XLSX/PPTX files), although they should understand
that only ODF will provide the best level of document interoperability, as
it is the native LibreOffice file format and it is also supported by the
latest versions of MS Office for Windows.

Of course, users should also understand that proprietary formats like RTF
and legacy MS Office formats have been developed in order to lock them in
into using MS Office, and should avoid the formats not because they are
intrinsically bad (although they often are) but because they intentionally
reduce their freedom.

Although user habits could let many user think that MS Office legacy
formats are the most practical for interoperability, they should not
overlook the fact that by sticking to MS Office legacy format they
perpetuate their lock in into Microsoft products.

TDF is actively promoting ODF, which is the format of choice for all
actual and future versions of LibreOffice. ODF is not only open and
standard, but is also easier to implement than other ISO standard formats.
For instance, OOXML has been approved as ISO standard in 2008, but after
almost four years is still implemented in the non standard "transitional"
version even by Microsoft (the company behind the original format) because
of the incredible complexity of the format (confirmed by the length of the
documentation of over 7.200 pages, i.e. almost six times as many as the
ODF documentation).

This incredible complexity is a new form of lock in, as it makes extremely
difficult to reproduce the file format. LibreOffice, on the other way,
represents the best third party implementation of OOXML.

If you want to contribute towards reaching a future when "most of the
world" are at least _aware_ of odf, you should:
(a) send documents in pdf to view or odf to edit and tell your recipients
about your use of LO to produce your documents
in pdf & odf; > (b) send documents in odf and tell your recipients that
such documents will be visible in m$o but the
quality will be poor, otherwise recommend use of LO to view/edit document
to high quality.

I think that LibreOffice advocates should promote ODF by suggesting them
to install LibreOffice, in order to get all the benefits of a truly open
and standard format as ODF, but should also respect the choice of people
who are not willing to change their office suite. Of course, if these
people are still using MS Office 2003, it is easy to explain that
LibreOffice provides a very similar user experience while offering a large
number of new features and security updates.

-- 
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+help@.libreoffice
Problems?
http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be
deleted



--
View this message in context: 
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/can-I-make-Libre-default-to-save-as-rtf-tp3527035p3533757.html
Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-- 
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+help@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.