On 11/02/2011 09:16 AM, Tom Davies wrote:
Hi :) It looks pretty clear to me.
What looks "pretty clear" to you?
Anyway you can never really trust
how the thread might have been manipulated along the way so judging
people based on a reply of a reply of a reply would be pretty dumb.
The content is more important than who said what and is only useful
if the most recent post in the thread doesn't seem to make much sense
on it's own.
Nonsense. Harold knows how to read threads (even top-posted mangled ones).
There is no need to give people a hard time just because they don't
do things your way. Freedom of choice right? Regards from Tom :)
Excuse me? "don't do things your way"?? If I post a reply and attribute
the content to you, and you hadn't posted any of it would that be
"Freedom of choice"? Nevermind, don't answer that; it will keep the list
cleaner.
...
--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+help@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Context
- RE: [libreoffice-users] LO Conflicts with OOo (continued)
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.