At 10:33 08/10/2011 +0100, Aonly Gonly wrote:
I do have one bone of contention where I do think that MS Office is
superior to LibO Writer though, and that is in MS Office's
formatting of bullets. In MSO, when one inserts bullets and they
appear too far away from the border of a table, one merely needs to
right click on the bullet and select "reduce indent" (or increase
for the alternative option of moving the bullet further from the table border).
Whilst the experts are arguing, may I attempt some assistance? ;^)
You need to open the Bullets and Numbering dialogue. You can get to
this at right-click | Numbering/Bullets... or at Format | Bullets and
Numbering... or through the button at the right of the Bullets and
Numbering toolbar. (I see you mention tables. When the cursor is in
a table cell, the context menu does not appear to include
"Numbering/Bullets...", so you will have to use one of the two other
routes.) In this dialogue, select the Position tab. To modify the
indenting of your bullets, simply change the value for "Aligned at".
I'm obviously very bad at doing so correctly however, because the
effect I achieve is variable, and inevitably ends up with the rest
of the text hanging off at indentations that I don't want.
By default, I think any text will not have hanging indents, but these
may well appear if you have modified the alignment as above. But you
can simply correct the indentation by modifying the "Indent at" value
on the Position tab. If you want no further indents, you probably
want the "Indent at" value to match the tab stop position under
"Numbering followed by".
Is there a simple way that I can align/ indent bullets so that they
are flush against the border of a table and not spend fruitless
amounts of time trying to figure this out from scratch each time?
Yes: set the "Aligned at" value to zero.
Additionally, the alignment for numbering is messy especially when
using Roman numerals (i), (ii) because by the time one gets to
(iii), the text now appears significantly indented from the brackets
of the (iii) and just looks ridiculous.
The text is aligned by default at a tab stop, and the default
position for this is too close to for your "(iii)" to fit in - so the
text is moved to the next tab stop (probably one of the regularly
spaced default tab stops). To remedy this, increase the value for
the tab stop position under "Numbering followed by".
Any straightforward suggestions on how to fix this without the
requirement for me to become some kind of text formatting guru?
I suggest you spend a few minutes experimenting with values on the
Position tab; then you might become a guru!
I trust this helps.
Brian Barker
--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+help@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.