Hi Tom ;) Tom wrote:
If you want greater stability then the official releases are better. I think the daily builds are pre-release and only really for testing purposes? I agree about fundamentally broken ones being removed but isn't it part of the process? ie you find how something is broken and then someone finds a way to fix it? Without the build it might not be clear that there is a breakage or what has caused it.
Yes, daily builds are meant for testing purposes. If there was a scenario in which it would work for some people but not for others then it would be worth leaving them online in order to narrow down what circumstances prevented it from working on some PCs but not on others. But since these builds are not working AT ALL and this is known, I believe it is better to pull them off. There is no point in additional people downloading them to find out that they are broken :) -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Win-XP-Daily-master-build-tp3365471p3366708.html Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+help@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted