Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: LibreOffice 3.3.3 is ready for download

On 06/20/2011 05:14 PM, Sam Frybyte wrote:
> YEs! I can't install it either I get two errors
> 2908 and 1935
> Still hoping that someone has an answer to how to solve it.
> But I wasn't aware that there was a way to download the previous version can
> you direct me to that?
>
> Thanks
> Jay
>
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 9:21 AM, Twayne<TWAYNE@twaynesdomain.com>  wrote:

Was this the .NET errors?

I had dialog boxes with errors, but when I answered the "properly" LO 
3.3.3 installed completely.
I installed it on a 32-bit Vista Home/Premium laptop with all the 
updates on it, including the .NET updates.

So it could be XP SP3 or something else causing the problem.  I just 
went along with the dialogs with "yes" for answers.


> > In news:4DF9DEFD.8000502@documentfoundation.org,
> > Italo Vignoli<italo.vignoli@documentfoundation.org>  typed:
> > > LibreOffice 3.3.3 is ready for download
> > >
> > > The Document Foundation announces the availability of
> > > LibreOffice 3.3.3, a new release of the most stable
> > > version of the free office suite for personal
> > > productivity, targetingcorporate users. LibreOffice 3.3.3
> > > is already available for download at the following
> > > address: http://www.libreoffice.org/download.
> > ...
> >
> > Has anyone else had a problem installinhg LO 3.3.3? When I start the
> > install, all I get is an error message "Installer Integrity Check Failed"
> > and then something to the effect of: ... see source and get a new copy of
> > the app.
> >
> > Win XP Pro SP3+, removed LO 3.3.2 and tried to install 3.3.3:
> >
> > I've downloaded it twice (the multi version plus the Help each time) after
> > a
> > full
> > directory and Registry item removal for any references to LO, but no
> > change.
> > I thought the site had checksums someplace for comparisons, but I can't
> > find
> > them, although both downloads had the same checksum.
> >    It's also confusing because the file sizes given online are apparently
> > the unpacked sizes, not the sze of the files to be downloaded. In addition
> > to that, things get confusing because it's variously called version 3, 3.3,
> > and 3.3.3 in the paperwork. Can't a search&  destroy be used on those files
> > to have them all reference the right files version/s?
> >
> > Anyone else have that error message? Know of a fix or work-around for it?
> > Any idea whether it's "me" causing the above error message or the
> > downloaded
> > code?
> > Are there any checksums, hash, etc., available for the app?
> >    I finally went back and re-installed 3.3.2 and all went fine, so ... it
> > really seems like something is wrong with the integral installer on 3.3.3;
> > I
> > wasn't aware until now that it had its own installer.  I can't even begin
> > to
> > install it because that error message pops up immediately.
> >
> > HTH,
> >
> > Twayne`
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to users+help@global.libreoffice.org
> > In case of problems unsubscribing, write to
> > postmaster@documentfoundation.org
> > Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
> > List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
> > All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be
> > deleted


--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to users+help@global.libreoffice.org
In case of problems unsubscribing, write to postmaster@documentfoundation.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted