On 2011-05-30 11:42 AM, Roland Hughes wrote:
Editing and/or responding within the "original message" is considered
tampering with evidence.
Rotflmao even harder!
Roland, where do you get this garbage? Do you make it up as you go?
Everyone is supposed to TOP POST, not only to save developer time,
Stop it, please, my sides are hurting!
but to allow the legal teams to read from the bottom up on the last
message identifying how things progressed this far.
Sorry, I don't modify my personal habits to fit the needs of Outlook
weened lawyer drones.
The chain of evidence for legal purposes is in the ORIGINAL emails, not
endlessly/mindlessly quoted copies of stupid email signatures and
mindless and unenforceable legal disclaimers.
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to users+help@libreoffice.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.