The point is, the business user receives a document in m$ word, is not
prepared to pay for m$ office and so _chooses_ to use LO, then
complains that LO is "incompatible" (never that m$o is incompatible
with LO! Or ODF!).
When a business user (who hopefully has made a donation to the FOSS
community since higher profits may have been obtained by using OSS)
receives an LO Writer document from a customer that has been corrupted
during transmission between LO programs installed on customer and
supplier computers, _that_ is of higher priority to resolve.
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to users+help@libreoffice.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Context
- Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: LibreOffice VS MS Office · e-letter
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.