All,
On Wed, 2011-04-20 at 12:05 +0100, Tom Davies wrote:
Hi :)
There seems to be an assumption that MS Office would be un-installed or that
people would be forced to stop using MS Office and that the change would have to
be implemented 'overnight'. None of that assumption is valid.
People could and probably would continue to use MS Office but would gain access
to the extra functionality offered in LibreOffice. This is much the same as
Adobe Acrobat Writer which office workers are often expected to install or
upgrade in order to read pdf.
Pdf is dominant on websites as THE way that documents are available for
download. Often there is a download link nearby in case anyone has not got the
latest version. People seem to consider it completely normal to have to
download and update Acrobat but it doesn't stop them using MS Office.
Regards from
Tom :)
________________________________
From: Glenn <glennst01@gmail.com>
To: users@libreoffice.org
Sent: Wed, 20 April, 2011 8:35:14
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Compatibility 2
All,
I agree with many to a large extent.
You can't expect business to be smart enough or even care
enough to act in the best interest of their customers. The
right thing is never thoroughly examined, much less even
considered, and the paying user is thereby cheated.
Glenn
inOn 4/19/11 7:08 AM, Ken Springer wrote:
On 4/19/11 4:57 AM, timi@iafrica.com wrote:
You simply cannot expect a commercial concern who have already spent a fortune
on MS
licences to download and use LibO just because I want to send them an
non-standard slide
show. They won't change therefore if I want the business I have to.... end of
story.
This is generally my thought/point about MS and the lack of willingness of big
business to abandon Windows XP for Vista and/or Windows 7.
If you want a business to change to a different OS and/or software package, you
are going to have to provide something business sees as a smart, cost effective
change.
Being free just doesn't cut it, since that doesn't take into the account the
number of paid manhours it would take to make the swap, a swap which would
include training, and being able to access years of company records.
Ken
-- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to users+help@libreoffice.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
The only time I have ever see an office suite removed is when I used the
Ubuntu repository to install LO, OOo was removed by the OS. This is a
Linux only issue when using the repository. I do not know if other Linux
distros do this. If you installed LO without using the Ubuntu software
management you can install LO along side OOo. The installation of other
suites (KOffice in Linux) or office software does not affect LO in
Linux.
In Windows, the only possible effect is changing the default program for
MS Office file types. This could occur if the user is not paying
attention and blindly clicks boxes. I believe the default install
behavior does not change the default program for MS Office file types to
LO. This is true if someone installed any other office suite in Windows.
They can happily coexist with affecting each other.
--
Jay Lozier
Jslozier@gmail.com
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to users+help@libreoffice.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Context
[libreoffice-users] Re: Compatibility · Wayne Borean
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.