Hi everyone,I'm using a font with more than two "fatness" degrees, namely "light", "roman" and "bold". More precisely: Frutiger. For each of these modes, there's a normal and an italic variant, giving six varieties, instead of the usual four (normal, italic, bold, bold italic)
Now in earlier versions of OOo, that used to result in several apparent fonts (named "frutiger 45 light" and "frutiger 55 roman") in the font list, one being the light, the other the roman version, which includes the bold look (no idea what the boldified "light" variant is equal to).
With OOo 3.2, that changed, and I only saw one single "Frutiger" font, with all the other six options as variants of this one. Which is way more practical, I think.
But since I've switched to LO 3.3.1, the old behaviour is kind of back again: One font named "Frutiger 45 light" which contains the original light and bold options, and one named "Frutiger 55 Roman" with a non-specified bold option. All my templates are using the unified font, and I can't be quite sure whether it's being applied correctly, For example with the OOo 3.2 behaviour, applying a "bold" modifier via template would always use the "66 Bold" style, regardless of wether the original font was light or Roman, now there are two different (I checked it, they are different) "bold" styles.
Is there a way to bring the old behaviour back? This is probably not a frequent problem, but it can mess up my layout pretty bad :(
Zak -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to users+help@libreoffice.org List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/users/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***