Re: [libreoffice-users] Update from 3.3.1-rc-2 to 3.3.1

MR ZenWiz <mrzenwiz@gmail.com> wrote on 2011-02-23 11:46:

> On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 8:42 AM, Manfred J. Krause
> <courrier.oou.fr.mjk@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > Yes.
> > "This release is bit-for-bit identical to the 3.3.1 Release Candidate
> > 2, so you don't need to download or reinstall if you have that version
> > already."
> > → Release Notes – LibreOffice 3.3.1 Final (2011-02-23)
> > <http://www.libreoffice.org/download/release-notes/>
>
> Unfortunately, this also includes the minor detail that the downloaded
> tarball, at least for 64 bit deb packages, still has the same
> directory name as rc2, so manual intervention is required to do the
> install (i.e., that script I posted some time back won't work with
> this release because the tarball's name does not match the untarred
> directory).
>
> Is a little consistency in the releases too much to ask?
 
Perhaps you know, that 3.3.1-rc2 is identical to 3.3.1 (final). And I
think this is the reason, that all (files, sizes ...) are the same.
And if both versions are the same, why should they compile and package 
all packages for all architetures again only for changing ONE number?

---
Have a nice day.

Joachim (Germany)

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to users+help@libreoffice.org
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/users/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***