Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index

MR. ZW, let's play nice now, OK?  :)

So regarding the thread of substance, what is DIFFERENT about the Ubuntu vs.
Deb, vs "official" LO application? I didn't think that the Canonical folks
MODIFY anything, correct?  

I think that  "keeping Ubuntu version separate from all others" seems to be
strangely counterproductive; being that the latest Ubuntu is both featuring
and promoting LO...  Not that separate is bad, but having independent bug
resources and not always keeping "in sync" seems so carbon-paper and manual
typewriter... ;)

Ubuntu 10.04 LTS & Windows XP-SP3 - (1) 2.8 G/2G RAM/ATI HD2600,512VRAM/SIS
AC97 OB Audio (2) 2.9 G/3G RAM/NVIDIA 9500GT,1024VRAM/SB AudigySE Audio (3)
2.3 G/2G RAM/NVIDIA FX1500M,256VRAM/Sigmatel HD Aud
View this message in context:
Sent from the Users mailing list archive at

Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to
List archive:
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.