Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2010 Archives by date, by thread · List index




So, if an idea is new and has not received any votes yet it will be far far
down
the list.  Hence only fairly old and well marketed ideas reach anywhere
near the
top.


Dropbox solves this by having four tabs (which are basically sort
criterias): by Popularity (i.e. vote number), Newest (by date), In Progress
and Completed.
(Actually Mozilla has the same filters and more, except for Newest)

In any case that is the base of the democracy/meritocracy: the ideas with
more votes (and hopefully merit) stand out
Of course this deprecates excellent ideas which go un-noticed because they
were poorly tagged or described.
There are no perfect systems...


Some obsolete ideas 'may' have been removed by a person working through
'some'
of the list.  This still leaves many old ideas much further up the list
than
newly suggested ideas.


That is why I suggested that the devs discussed the topten monthly so that
no single person would dismiss an idea.
If the topten remain the same because none has been added/dismissed, the
following ten should be discussed..

New ideas just need to have supporters, which means many people agree that
the idea is good...

Regards,
Pedro





________________________________
From: plino <[hidden email]<http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=2126166&i=0>>

To: [hidden email] <http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=2126166&i=1>
Sent: Tue, 21 December, 2010 11:08:14
Subject: [libreoffice-users] Re: Idea about Ideas


I found Ubuntu Brainstorm very dis-satisfying.  The main problem with it
(imo)
is that the first few pages are all old ideas that have received a lot of

votes.



If the first page had the most easily viable ideas along with the most
innovative and interesting ideas then it would work a lot better.  The
problem
is how could that be automated??


That is quite simple. If the ideas are outdated they should simply be
dismissed by the devs as Outdated :)

The voting process is the most democratic (anyone can suggest an idea) and
the most meritocratic (the best ideas climb to the top independently of who

suggested them)

Of course this "forces" the devs to take a look at the list, say once a
month, discuss the top 10 items and classify them as Planned, Outdated,
Portponed, Rejected, etc (this is a mix of options available in Dropbox and

Sourceforge)

As soon as an idea is classified as Completed it is archived and the next
most voted idea will rise to the top 10 "automagically" ;)

--
View this message in context:

http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Idea-about-Ideas-tp2117657p2125442.html<http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Idea-about-Ideas-tp2117657p2125442.html?by-user=t>

Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [hidden 
email]<http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=2126166&i=2>
List archive: http://www.libreoffice.org/lists/users/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***



--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [hidden 
email]<http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=2126166&i=3>
List archive: http://www.libreoffice.org/lists/users/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***


------------------------------
 View message @
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Idea-about-Ideas-tp2117657p2126166.html

To unsubscribe from Idea about Ideas, click 
here<http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_code&node=2117657&code=cGVkbGlub0BnbWFpbC5jb218MjExNzY1N3wtMTcxMDU2NTk1NA==>.



-- 
View this message in context: 
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Idea-about-Ideas-tp2117657p2126298.html
Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to users+help@libreoffice.org
List archive: http://www.libreoffice.org/lists/users/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.