Yes, but this is how the naming process works in software versions and engineering updates.
long sequences of minor releases (7.6, in the current case) are
getting boring and not important for the users (for both enterprise and
individual profiles).
Here's the guide in the Cell Phone Standards -
The contents of the present documentare subject to continuing work within the development group and
may changefollowing formal development group approval. Should the development group modify the
contents ofthe present document, it will be re-released by the development group with anidentifying
change of release date and an increase in version numberas follows:
A.x.y.z
where A is the major revision number. (version 7 in our case)
and where x.y.z arethe version number of the standard Awhere:x the first digit:1 presented to the
development group for information;2 presented to the development group for approval to next level3
or greater indicates the development group approved document underchange control.y the second digit
is incremented for all changes of substance, i.e.technical enhancements, corrections, updates,
etc.z the third digit is incremented when editorial only changes havebeen incorporated in the
document.
Ben Levitan
Wireless Cellular Telecommunications Expert
Consulting and Expert Witness Services
www.BenLevitan.com
919/420-0924
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Historical Cell Phone Records Analysis
sent from my IBM Selectric Typewriter
________________________________________________
-----Original Message-----
From: Gustavo Buzzatti Pacheco <gbpacheco@gmail.com>
To: TDF Devs <libreoffice@lists.freedesktop.org>; TDF Marketing <marketing@global.libreoffice.org>;
TDF Design <design@global.libreoffice.org>
Sent: Wed, Apr 5, 2023 5:05 pm
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-marketing] Re: [libreoffice-design] Moving to LibreOffice 8?
Hi Eyal, all!
I also respectfully disagree with you on some points. ;D
I like the idea to move to 8, even with no big technical innovation (if we
have, for sure it will be better).
IMHO, long sequences of minor releases (7.6, in the current case) are
getting boring and not important for the users (for both enterprise and
individual profiles).
I'm not saying that we should embrace the Firefox approach, but thinking
about Italo's idea (8 <-> infinite), I guess the message of this version
could be consolidation, not exactly innovation.
Best
Gustavo
On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 4:23 AM Eyal Rozenberg <eyalroz1@gmx.com> wrote:
I respectfully disagree with Italo.
First, about the "frame of reference". In my opinion, decisions such as
major version number bumping are not, first and foremost, marketing
decisions. That is a _consideration_, since the version number is
declarative than technical. But - such an action should be "truthful"
before being "marketable".
It is more important, in my opinion, that users and potential users
receive trustworthy signaling from the project - not just w.r.t. version
numbers, but generally - than for the media to get a gimmick for coverage.
A second point is that bumping a version number without a major
innovation moves you a few more steps into the category of, say, Firefox
and such, where versions just increase automatically with no meaning
whatsoever. Italo, you said we are perceived as a "real innovator";
well, when a real innovator starts having hollow version number bumping,
that perception fades.
Finally, everyone who likes the marketing potential of version 8 -
great, but - keep that benefit for when we have a significant step
forward to celebrate. Don't squander it.
Eyal
PS: availability on a new platform is not a reason to bump a version
number. It's the "same" software, but built for another target, so same
version as before. IMHO anyway.
On 27/03/2023 20:11, Italo Vignoli wrote:
Moving to LibreOffice 8 (instead of 7.6) makes sense for marketing
purposes, as media is looking at LibreOffice as the real innovator in
the open source office suite market, and the feeling of journalists is
that we are forever stuck at 7.x.
We all know that the next version will not include any significant
innovation which can justify the change of version, apart from the new
build system for Windows and the availability of LibreOffice for Arm
processors on Windows (which has not been announced).
Playing with the number 8, which can be rotated 90° to become the
"infinite" symbol, we can frame the next version as LibreOffice for an
infinite number of users, as we cover all hardware platforms and all
operating systems for personal productivity.
This is my opinion. If the community wants to stick with 7.6, I won't
insist. I have received enough insults both public and private for the
marketing plan, and I am still receiving them from a few people, that I
am not willing to enter into that process again (even if the decision on
the "community" tag has not been mine, but it looks like people have a
very short memory).
Looking forward to your thoughts.
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: marketing+unsubscribe@global.libreoffice.org
Problems?
https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: https://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/marketing/
Privacy Policy: https://www.documentfoundation.org/privacy
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: marketing+unsubscribe@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: https://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/marketing/
Privacy Policy: https://www.documentfoundation.org/privacy
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: marketing+unsubscribe@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: https://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/marketing/
Privacy Policy: https://www.documentfoundation.org/privacy
Context
- [libreoffice-marketing] Re: Moving to LibreOffice 8? (continued)
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.