Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2012 Archives by date, by thread · List index

Jay Lozier wrote (31-10-12 17:06)
On 10/31/2012 11:13 AM, Marc Paré wrote:

IMO, we should not respond to his article and just let it die a slow
death, we should not give him the "soap box" that he is looking for.
Anyone with common sense can read the writing on the wall. Let's keep
on our track and not worry about such articles. It still doesn't stop
us from reading them and taking out what may be of value to us.
Agreed, read them, discuss what we can learn from them and move on. In
this case I would say the real problem is accurately determining actual
usage from various raw download statistics for any FOSS project not just
LO. A download does not mean regular user.

Apart from statistical and measuring challenges: our downloads are interesting for us - it tells something about the way we do. Trying to compare these numbers with those of a product that flows on glory from the past, would look quite silly, IMO.


 - Cor

Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to
Posting guidelines + more:
List archive:
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.