Jay Lozier wrote (31-10-12 17:06)
On 10/31/2012 11:13 AM, Marc Paré wrote:
IMO, we should not respond to his article and just let it die a slow
death, we should not give him the "soap box" that he is looking for.
Anyone with common sense can read the writing on the wall. Let's keep
on our track and not worry about such articles. It still doesn't stop
us from reading them and taking out what may be of value to us.
Agreed, read them, discuss what we can learn from them and move on. In
this case I would say the real problem is accurately determining actual
usage from various raw download statistics for any FOSS project not just
LO. A download does not mean regular user.
Apart from statistical and measuring challenges: our downloads are
interesting for us - it tells something about the way we do.
Trying to compare these numbers with those of a product that flows on
glory from the past, would look quite silly, IMO.
Regards,
--
- Cor
- http://nl.libreoffice.org
- www.librelex.org
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to marketing+help@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/marketing/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.