I guess this is mostly for Italo or anyone else who is well informed:
I am just wondering about this. I am seeing a larger number of devs
pronouncing themselves on their work being of MPL/LGPLv3+ dual licence.
From a marketing point of view, is there anything that we should be
prepared to answer if asked of the reason behind LibreOffice being
offered under this dual licence?
* Why the dual Licence and what does the MPL offer that the LGPLv3+ does
* Our download page states the following in the footer: "This does not
include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the GNU
Lesser General Public License (LGPLv3)." Should this be updated?
* I imagine that the first part of the footer: "Copyright information:
Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are
licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0
License." does not need updating.
Thanks for any info.
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to firstname.lastname@example.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/marketing/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
- [libreoffice-marketing] Dual licensing of LibreOffice · Marc Paré
Impressum (Legal Info)
: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our trademark policy