On 03/23/2011 10:52 AM, Italo Vignoli wrote:
On 3/23/11 3:35 PM, Kinshuk Sunil wrote:
Do we have any licensing guideline for Marketing materials?
No. I use Creative Commons CC-BY-SA because is known outside the
software world (although in a very limited way). I do not use the GFDL
because a presentation does not belong to the documentation category.
Surely we agree this is instructional material, the presentation is its
supporting material. that's why I sometimes use GFDL for presentations.
FSF states that: "The GFDL was designed for manuals, textbooks, other
reference and instructional materials, and documentation which often
accompanies GNU software".
Slideshare is very popular, and presentations published on SlideShare
are usually picked up by search engines and are easier to find by
people outside the software industry.
As I wrote, when you publish there **only**, problems outweigh the
benefits. Once again, we should not publish ONLY to SaaS sites that have
the least valid argument for putting content **only** in such sites. My
***personal*** preference is to not publish on such sites at all.
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to firstname.lastname@example.org
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/marketing/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
- Re: [libreoffice-marketing] reg: Presentation - Introducing LibreOffice (continued)
Impressum (Legal Info)
: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our trademark policy