Le 2010-12-26 09:27, Tom Davies a écrit :
Hi Tom:
Our competitors are selling their product for about $50 per unit and many people
would say that by selling for less we are saying our product is worth that much
less. Their logic is that if product A costs $50 then it is worth $50 and if
product B sells at $5 then product A is 'obviously' the better product.
Selling the product for $1.25 is insultingly low and really says the product is
not really worth buying at all!
The Free Software Foundation is not against people selling or profiting from
Free/OpenSource software. The GPL is not against it either. The caveat is that
when the product is sold (or even given away) the potential recipient is given
the address of where they can get a copy of the Source Code. Personally i would
tend to go further and give them the address of where they can download the
product for free.
When selling the product it would be ideal if the 'vendor' could keep a fair
profit in addition to covering costs. How else are we going to get established
distribution networks to sell the product? If established retailers are never
going to sell the product then what other distribution networks are we going to
use? Perhaps we should rely on drug-dealers or some similar dodgy-looking
network to take care of pushing our product for us!
Yes, ideally some of that money would go back into TDF but at the very least
some needs to cover the costs, including time& effort, storage and all the rest
of the costs that people don't notice when they are committed to to fighting for
a good cause.
I would say $5 or even $10 is about right, or £5 or £10 in the Uk. It is just
enough to make people realise that it is a legitimate product without being as
much as the market would be willing to spend if they realised how good the
product is.
Regards from
Tom :)
I also agree with this. We should at least cover the cost of S/H as well
as work some profit into the sale. Some of the profit should go back to
the TDF but the profit could also be added to the use of the machines to
copy which will also need to be replaced at some point ... sort of an
amortization cost for the hardware.
As Tom points out, there is also the look of software legitimacy. I can
see a low sell cost if there are multiple DVD requests from one
particular individual or of special circumstances where a low sell point
is establish to "seed" a particular region on the map or for some kind
of financial concern for a particular group or region.
BTW ... there is a thread on the German list re: a DVD design. Jens has
proposed a design and it can be found here:
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/User:JeHa. The thread can also be
found here:
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.documentfoundation.libreoffice.discuss.german/1441.
I like the design for its simplicity and it will also look nice using
Lightscribe for burning the DVD label.
BTW ... there is a wiki page for DVD suppliers and this can also be
found here:
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.documentfoundation.libreoffice.discuss.german/1441
If anyone is interested in becoming (unofficially) a supplier, feel
free to add your name to the list. I believe that the official list will
be establish later on after discussion.
Marc
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to marketing+help@libreoffice.org
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/marketing/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.