Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2014 Archives by date, by thread · List index


On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 02:56:39PM +0200, Khaled Hosny wrote:
I actually wonder why the Debian rules file needs to explicitly list
the languages to be built, was it so that en-US is the first one as the
comment above it says, or are there other reasons?

1) en-US has to be the first. at least had to be in the past for configure
to actualy do the right thing.

2) we want tzpo have a choice what to include and what not. that means not ALL
languages which mightz be too less transalted ans increase the build time/uplload time/...

3) we need a list for packaging it  up, do the package descriptions from etc.
 We d*doÜ have custom rules which need to iterate over all the languages and
 do stuff. (And we have rules to fix upstream brokeness up and to merge ca and ca_XV. Wouldn't be 
possible or would be more complex with ALL there.

4) historical reasons :)



P.S.: Why on earth is libreoffice-l10n even in CC?

To unsubscribe e-mail to:
Posting guidelines + more:
List archive:
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.