On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 2:00 AM, Andras Timar <timar74@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
2012/8/6 Martin Srebotnjak <miles@filmsi.net>:
Since some look like stoppers, especially the extension/bundled
dictionary bug, I wonder what localization teams leads think about it.
What is an office suite without a broken basic spell-checking function?
Workaround exists, and workaround does not have side effects, so it is
not a stopper.
Andras
I'm not convinced. Kludgy workarounds are no excuse for not fixing
critical bugs before a major release. I'm afraid that I have to agree
with Martin that I would have considered that particular bug a
blocker. My general impression is that FOSS users are not hung up on
schedules and a delayed release is not a big deal, but missing major
features in a major release seems like a bad idea.
You never get a second chance to make a good first impression.
cjl
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to l10n+help@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/l10n/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.