On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 11:05 PM, Andras Timar <timar74@gmail.com> wrote:
Apache Foundation requires Apache License which is not a copyleft license.
It allows use of the source code – and my translations, too – for the
development of proprietary software.
This means that changes can be cherry picked out and included in
libreoffice, no?
That seems to be good enough. I have to say that my first impression
of new libreoffice is very good. It is so much faster than ooo for
some reason.
Also, may i ask what is the point of a lgpl. library gpl for an
application, does that make sense? I guess it is historical. Why not
switch to gpl pure.
mike
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to l10n+help@libreoffice.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/l10n/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.