Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index


On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 11:05 PM, Andras Timar <timar74@gmail.com> wrote:
Apache  Foundation requires Apache License which is not a copyleft license.
It allows use of the source code – and my translations, too – for the
development of proprietary software.
This means that changes can be cherry picked out and included in
libreoffice, no?
That seems to be good enough. I have to say that my first impression
of new libreoffice is very good. It is so much faster than ooo for
some reason.

Also, may i ask what is the point of a lgpl. library gpl for an
application, does that make sense? I guess it is historical. Why not
switch to gpl pure.

mike

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to l10n+help@libreoffice.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/l10n/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.