On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 3:49 PM, Mikel Pascual <mikel.paskual@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 7:54 PM, Rimas Kudelis <rq@akl.lt> wrote:
2011.01.14 19:14, sophie rašė:
Hello,
Hello to you all,
I'm new here. I've been a translator for lots of projects, but just
found out about the LibreOffice fork and i'm very happy to get away
from Oracle. Sorry to start with a "me too" response, but i don't know
how people get their voices heard otherwise around here yet.
My plan is to hand out only e-mail forwarders, not real mailboxes with
POP and IMAP, as the latter one requires lots of maintenance.
However, as we had lots of irritating issues with @openoffice.org e-mail
addresses, I would like to avoid these mistakes.
...
For LibreOffice, I'm a bit hesitant to hand out @libreoffice.org, as
this may seem like people are acting on behalf of TDF, causing liability
issues. Maybe I'm too touchy, so I'm happy for comments, which is why I
am writing this mail. :-)
...
I'd like to avoid subdomains (@community.libreoffice.org), as they are
really ugly for e-mail accounts.
I think domains like libreofficecommunity.org are just as ugly.
I agree.
I'd say it should be either libreoffice.org, or nothing. After all, it's
nobody's obligation to offer email addresses to anyone, so why not just make
up some rules (not necessarily formal) instead of being touchy?
It seems to me that if you give someone an address then you are
indeed giving them some authority to "speak for" the organization. Why
shouldn't people use their own addresses?
I first thought that maybe the Steering Committee and people in charge of
l10n/marketing/website/etc should get one, so things could be more official.
but... things would be more official, and it may discourage people to debate
after a response from a @libreoffice.org mail?
If someone is discouraged by the return address of a member of the
Steering Committee then they will probably be discouraged to reply to
a Committee member no matter what their address.
it's great to see the willingness to give @libreoffice.org addresses, but I
don't see the advantages; apart from the excitement of having
me@libreoffice.org, of course.
Yes. It would be "cool", but unnecessary.
I may be wrong, and a @libreoffice.org reward is worth the effort?
I have many domains where i give out addresses. There is work
involved and i wonder if it's worth the effort administering the
addresses, rather than putting that into LibreOffice itself?
Actually, I can't think of any other open-source project (except
OpenOffice.org) that would offer email addresses to anyone, and I don't
think it's necessary (as if we all didn't have a bunch of addresses
already).
Agreed.
Thank you.
--
universero trio
Esperanto, The International Language! What's that? See http://Esperanto.Org
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to l10n+help@libreoffice.org
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/l10n/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.