Hi,
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 23:52, Pau Iranzo <pau@somgnu.cat> wrote:
Hi,
I just want to point out that a variation of Catalan known as «Catalan
(Valencian)» (both variants spoken in Spain) has a modifier assigned
by the IANA on 2005 (-valencia). Right now and because of the OOo
development, we're using the ca_XV code for this variant (ca_ES for
Catalan).
Thanks for you information.
There has no modifier ever assigned to Chinese languages, because they
are not commonly said "variants". Traditional and Simplified Chinese
are different in characters, vocabularies, and common usages. They are
both Chinese in linguistic, but really have many differences.
Something similar happens with Serbian and other variants. I don't
really known what is the state of this question on OOo or LibO, but it
should be interesting to implement the BCP47 standard
(http://www.rfc-editor.org/bcp/bcp47.txt).
Regards,
Pau Iranzo
I know LO would be interested in BCP47, so I think it's OK to use it
in public usages (to users). But it shouldn't make translators get
confused (zh-Hans@CN or zh-CN@Hans or whatever in this way).
--
Regards,
Aron Xu
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to l10n+help@libreoffice.org
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/l10n/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.