Hi Martin,
2010.12.09 00:24, Martin Srebotnjak rašė:
2010/12/8 Rimas Kudelis<rq@akl.lt>:
Well, that would be annoying to download, for sure. But it's easy to solve
by simply compressing all the files in a self-extracting archive (the way
it's currently done).
Then again, with online installation, you wouldn't have to download anything
but setup.exe, which would download all needed components itself.
How would that look in a government or corporate environment? How
would installing Lithuanian or Slovenian LO with included help look
like on 1000 computers (if the sets do not include help at all and
need downloading those parts)? With no Internet access or limited
access due to security precautions? Will it include options to
download a full installation or all necessary parts and then make the
installation offline? Shouldn't this be already discussed and set into
stone by now?
It should be, but I don't know if it is. I'm not subscribed to the
discuss list where I guess this discussion indeed belongs... :)
Regarding corporate installations: like I said, you would probably
download a CD/DVD image and install directly from it, or perhaps use the
active directory to deploy LibO (I'm not saying that it already works
though, I don't know if it does). Downloading the installer to each and
every computer from Internet isn't the best idea here anyway, regardless
of whether or not the installer is one file or five files.
Again, I don't really have experience with corporate software
installation, but I would guess that downloading the installer is not
the biggest issue there. However, your suggestion to allow telling the
installer to just download files for offline installation is a good one,
and it should be considered by LibO people.
Or does LO not want to take OOo in its most promising territory - the
government/corporate environment and is solely meant for
English-speaking non-Windows users, mostly nerds not using
productivity suites more than 2 hours a week but enjoying telling
stories how they liberated an office suite from the evil corporation?
I don't know, I'm just a community member like you. And I must confess,
that I myself am a nerd using productivity suites less than 2 hours a
week... :) Well, at least I'm a Windows (as well as OS X and Linux)
user, what a relief! :D
BTW, isn't Google one of the official supporters of LO? Can't they
offer some hosting love to the LO full lang-packs?
Again, I don't know. That's definately a good idea. On the other hand,
even without Google's hosting, gigabytes are cheap nowadays. I don't
think it would be a big problem for LibO mirror to use more space. I
vote for quality and positive user experience.
Rimas
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to l10n+help@libreoffice.org
List archive: http://www.libreoffice.org/lists/l10n/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Context
- [libreoffice-l10n] Re: [Libreoffice] Comments on RC1 (continued)
(message not available)
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.