Re: Tracing where build time is spent

On 18/02/2020 13:17, Luboš Luňák wrote:
> On Tuesday 18 of February 2020, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> > You left it somewhat unclear what the target audiences for your various
> > performance improvement proposals are (local builds, Gerrit Jenkins
> > builds, other tinderbox builds, "official" TDF release builds, ...).
>
>   I assumed it was implied where it mattered. Using --enable-debug/dbgutil is
> for developer builds, isn't it?

...but then you mentioned "Windows Jenkins builds" with regard to 
--enable-python=system in your previous response.  Probably better to 
spell things out explicitly.

> > Using --enable-python=system for Gerrit Jenkins builds would trade
> > significance of those builds ("will a release build with this change be
> > good?") for build performance.
>
>   Strictly speaking, no Jenkins build does that except for the Linux GCC
> release one, as all the others build with --enable-dbgutil, so I find this
> argument weak. In practice it seems it's the tinderboxes that check this (if
> at all).

Still, I would prefer it if we keep the differences between Gerrit 
Jenkins and "official" TDF builds as meaningfully small as possible. 
The motivation for --enable-dbgutil deviation is certainly different 
from the motivation for --enable-python=system deviation.  Deviation 
motivated by build performance should IMO only be a last resort.