Le 20/08/2019 à 10:28, Julien a écrit :
Hi Julien,
+1 from me.
As a QA triager, I can but agree with Julien given the current stage of
development. The migration code still fails to handle multiple, basic
elements of embedded hsqldb ODB files found in actual use. If it can't
even do the basics of migration properly, what hope do we have of
convincing users to switch ?
Forcing users to be the unwitting testers (as is currently perceived to
be the case - indeed, I saw such a recrimination in a migration bug
report I dealt with today) of such a system is bound to provoke at best
apathy or resignation, at worst anger, frustration and searching for
another tool that won't trash your data.
Clearly, the work required for the tender by TDF was underestimated. I
see this currently as a kind of unwanted offspring, neither here, nor
there, and certainly not fit for purpose, despite all of the very good
work put in.
Anyway, my 2c as usual.
Alex
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.