> On 05/07/19 09:16, Uwe Brauer wrote: > Sorry but that completely misses the point. If it's read-only I won't > even bother to learn how to use it ... The point is: Since almost 10 years people are demanding such a feature and nothing happened. All I am saying is: if a read only feature can be _easily implemented_, then maybe more people will start even to consider such a feature as being useful and the pressure to have it as «a power tool» will grow. The alternative would be «shut up and how me your code», but I can't provide you the feature you desire, because I know almost nothing about LO internals.
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature