Re: Java min version for master sources?

Michael Stahl <mst -AT- libreoffice.org>
Tue, 21 May 2019 11:57:17 +0200

On 21.05.19 11:48, Samuel Mehrbrodt wrote:

Why not have a separate minumum java version for development?
We could require Java 8 for the dev/build machines, but produce java 6bytecode.
So for end users nothing changes (Java 6 still supported), butdevelopers can make use of new java features.

you could make use of new Java language features, but not new JDKlibrary features, which was the problem in this case.

Context

Java min version for master sources? · julien2412
- Re: Java min version for master sources? · Stephan Bergmann
  - Re: Java min version for master sources? · julien2412
    - Re: Java min version for master sources? · Stephan Bergmann
      - Re: Java min version for master sources? · julien2412
        
        Re: Java min version for master sources? · Stephan Bergmann
  - Re: Java min version for master sources? · Stephan Bergmann
    - Re: Java min version for master sources? · Samuel Mehrbrodt
      - Re: Java min version for master sources? · Stephan Bergmann
      - Re: Java min version for master sources? · Michael Stahl

Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.