On 8/30/2018 8:02 PM, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
On 30/08/18 18:43, Andreas Mantke wrote:
In my view it is necessary, that a LibreOffice extension that is
published on a TDF resource, has a clear license statement and presents
this license statement to the user during the installation process.
Why should presenting the license during installation be necessary?
Installing LO itself, for example, doesn't do that, either.
By the way, GPLv3 (for example) explicitly says what is required to do
with license when redistributing (4. "... give all recipients a copy of
this License along with the Program"; 9. "Acceptance Not Required for
Having Copies - You are not required to accept this License in order to
receive or run a copy of the Program").
--
Best regards,
Mike Kaganski
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.