Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2018 Archives by date, by thread · List index


Hi Markus,

I understand your concerns.
IMHO cmake is more portable than autoconf, and even much more simpler to use!

If you need help, I am willing to try my best.
I see not the need to support autoconf and cmake. I would terminate the autconf support.

Kind regards
Claus


Am 23.05.2018 um 02:17 schrieb Markus Mohrhard <markus.mohrhard@googlemail.com>:

I'm a bit concerned about having two build systems especially one that I can not maintain. In the 
past we solved this with the cmake branch but this also causes its own problems as the branch is 
constantly behind. Currently I have no good idea how to solve this problem but I'll try to spend 
some time thinking about solutions. I plan to release a new version 1.15.0 sometime in June and 
will get back to with some plan by then.

Kind regards,
Markus


Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.